Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 10 de 10
Filter
2.
European Heart Journal Supplements ; 24(SUPPL C):1, 2022.
Article in English | Web of Science | ID: covidwho-1885239
3.
European Heart Journal Supplements ; 24(SUPPL C):1, 2022.
Article in English | Web of Science | ID: covidwho-1886418
4.
QJM ; 114(9): 619-620, 2021 Nov 13.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1584068

ABSTRACT

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-COV-2) has been associated with coagulation dysfunction which predisposes patients to an increased risk of both venous and arterial thromboembolism, increasing the short-term morbidity and mortality. Current data evidenced that the rate of post-discharge thrombotic events in COVID-19 patients is lower compared to that observed during hospitalization. Rather than 'true thrombotic events', these complications seem more probably 'immunothrombosis' consequent to the recent infection. Unfortunately, the absence of data from randomized controlled trials, large prospective cohorts and ambulatory COVID-19 patients, left unresolved the question regarding the need of post-discharge thromboprophylaxis due to the absence of strong-level recommendations.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Thrombosis , Venous Thromboembolism , Aftercare , Anticoagulants , Humans , Patient Discharge , Prospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2 , Thrombosis/epidemiology , Thrombosis/etiology
5.
European Heart Journal ; 42(SUPPL 1):806, 2021.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-1554764

ABSTRACT

Background: The prevalence and prognostic implications of heart failure (HF), as a complication of COVID-19 infection remains unclear. Aims: We performed a systematic review and metanalysis aimed to evaluate the pooled incidence of acute HF as a cardiac complication of COVID- 19 disease and to estimate the related mortality risk in these patients. Methods: Data were obtained searching MEDLINE, Scopus and Web of Science for all investigations published any time to December 26, 2020. If statistical heterogeneity was 50%, the results were derived from the fixedeffects model otherwise the random-effects model. Results: Overall, 1064 patients [mean age 66 years, 618 males] were included in the final analysis reviewing six investigations. The cumulative in-hospital rate of COVID-19 patients complicated by acute HF ranged between 6.9 to 63.4% among the studies reviewed. A random effect model revealed a pooled incidence of COVID-19 patients complicated by acute HF in 20.2% of cases (95% CI: 11.1-33.9%, p<0.0001 I2=94.4%) (Figure 1, Panel A). A second pooled analysis, based on a random-effect model, confirmed a significant increased risk of death in COVID-19 patients complicated by acute HF during the infection (OR 9.36, 95% CI 4.76-18.4, p<0.0001, I2=56.6%) (Figure 1, Panel B). The Egger's tests revealed no evidence of publication bias in estimating both the primary and secondary outcome (t=0.058, p=0.956 and t=1.402, p=0.233, respectively). Meta-regression analysis, using age as moderator variable, failed in founding a statistically significant relationship with the incidence of acute HF onset as a complication of COVID-19 disease (p=0.062) or the mortality risk among the same subjects (p=0.053). Conclusions: Acute HF represents a frequent complication of COVID-19 infection associated with a higher risk of mortality in the short-term period.

6.
European Heart Journal ; 42(SUPPL 1):1096, 2021.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-1554763

ABSTRACT

Background: The prevalence and prognostic implications of coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients infected by the novel coronavirus 2019 disease (COVID-19) remain unclear. Purposes: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the prevalence and mortality risk in COVID-19 patients with preexisting CAD. PRISMA. guidelines were followed in ing data and assessing validity. We searched Medline, Scopus and Web of Science to locate all articles published up to December 8, 2020 reporting data of COVID-19 survivors and non-survivors with pre-existing CAD. Data were pooled using the Mantel-Haenszel random effects models with odds ratio (OR) as the effect measure with the related 95% confidence interval (CI). Statistical heterogeneity between groups was measured using the Higgins I2 statistic. Results: Twenty-four studies, enrolling 22744 patients [mean age 58.2 and 70.9 years for survivors and non-survivors (p<0.0001), respectively], met the inclusion criteria and were included into the final analysis. The pooled prevalence of pre-existing CAD in COVID-19 patients was 11.5% (95% CI 0.097-0.136) and resulted significantly higher in non-survivors compared to survivors (16.7% vs 7.1%, respectively, p<0.0001). A randomeffect model confirmed a significant higher risk of death in COVID- 19 patients with pre-existing CAD in the short-term period (OR 2.96, 95% CI 2.18-4.03, p<0.0001, I2=79%) (Figure 1). A meta-regression, using age as moderator, did not identify any statistical significance (Coeff: -0.046, 95% CI -0.101-0.009, p=0.104). The Egger's regression test (t=0.596;p=0.06) confirmed that there were not statistically evidences of publication bias Conclusions: Pre-existing CAD in COVID-19 patients significantly increased the risk of death during the infection.

7.
European Heart Journal, Supplement ; 22:G228-G232, 2020.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-1254655

ABSTRACT

Infections by SARS CoV2-COVID-19 have become in a short time a worldwide health emergency. Due to cardiovascular implications of COVID-19 and to very frequent previous cardiovascular disorders of COVID-19 patients, it is presently crucial that Cardiologists are fully aware of COVID-19 related epidemiological, pathophysiological and therapeutic problems, in order to manage at best the present emergency by appropriate protocols developed on the basis of the competences acquired and shared on the field. The aim of this document is to propose algorithms for the management of cardiovascular diseases during COVID-19 emergency with the objective of providing patients with optimal care, minimizing contagion risk and appropriately managing personal protective equipment.

8.
QJM ; 114(6): 390-397, 2021 Oct 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1169689

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The prevalence and prognostic implications of pre-existing dyslipidaemia in patients infected by the SARS-CoV-2 remain unclear. AIM: To assess the prevalence and mortality risk in COVID-19 patients with pre-existing dyslipidaemia. DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS: Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses guidelines were followed in abstracting data and assessing validity. We searched MEDLINE and Scopus to locate all the articles published up to 31 January 2021, reporting data on dyslipidaemia among COVID-19 survivors and non-survivors. The pooled prevalence of dyslipidaemia was calculated using a random-effects model and presenting the related 95% confidence interval (CI), while the mortality risk was estimated using the Mantel-Haenszel random-effect models with odds ratio (OR) and related 95% CI. Statistical heterogeneity was measured using the Higgins I2 statistic. RESULTS: Of about 18 studies, enrolling 74 132 COVID-19 patients (mean age 70.6 years), met the inclusion criteria and were included in the final analysis. The pooled prevalence of dyslipidaemia was 17.5% of cases (95% CI: 12.3-24.3%, P < 0.0001), with high heterogeneity (I2 = 98.7%). Pre-existing dyslipidaemia was significantly associated with higher risk of short-term death (OR: 1.69, 95% CI: 1.19-2.41, P = 0.003), with high heterogeneity (I2 = 88.7%). Due to publication bias, according to the Trim-and-Fill method, the corrected random-effect ORs resulted 1.61, 95% CI 1.13-2.28, P < 0.0001 (one studies trimmed). CONCLUSION: Dyslipidaemia represents a major comorbidity in about 18% of COVID-19 patients but it is associated with a 60% increase of short-term mortality risk.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Dyslipidemias , Aged , Comorbidity , Dyslipidemias/epidemiology , Humans , Prevalence , SARS-CoV-2
9.
European Heart Journal, Supplement ; 22:G217-G222, 2020.
Article in English | Scopus | ID: covidwho-1104869

ABSTRACT

At the end of 2019 a new Coronavirus appeared in China and, from there, it spread to the rest of the world. On 24th May, 2020, the confirmed cases in the world were more than 5 million and the deaths almost 350.000. At the end of May, Italy reported more than 27.000 cases among healthcare professionals and 163 deaths among physicians. The National Health Systems from almost all over the world, including Italy's, were unprepared for this pandemic, and this generated important consequences of organizational nature. All elective and urgent specialized activities were completely reorganized, and many hospital units were partially or completely converted to the care of the COVID-19 patients. A significant reduction in hospital admissions for acute heart disease were recorded during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic and, in order to gradually resume hospital activities, the Italian National Phase 2 Plan for the partial recovery of activities, must necessarily be associated with a Phase 2 Health Plan. In regards to the cardiac outpatient activities we need to identify short term goals, i.e. reschedule the suspended outpatient activities, revise the waiting lists, review the 'timings' of the bookings. This will reduce the number of available examinations compared to the pre-Covid-19 era. The GP's collaboration could represent an important resource, a structured telephone follow-up plan is advisable with the nursing staff's involvement. It is equally important to set medium-long term goals, the pandemic could be an appropriate moment for making a virtue of necessity. It is time to reason on prescriptive appropriateness, telemedicine implementation intended as integration to the traditional management. It is time to restructure the cardiological units related to the issue of structural adjustment to the needs for functional isolation. Moreover, the creation of 'grey zones' with multidisciplinary management according to the intensity of care levels seems to be necessary as well as the identification of Covid dedicated cardiologies. Finally, the pandemic could represent the opportunity for a permanent renovation of the cardiological and territorial medicine activities. © 2020 Oxford University Press. All rights reserved.

10.
European Heart Journal, Supplement ; 22:G223-G227, 2021.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-1093511

ABSTRACT

The COVID-19 pandemic has become a global health emergency. In Italy, the number of people infected by SARS-COVID-2 is rapidly increasing and what emerges from the current data is that the majority do not present any symptoms or only minor flu-like symptoms. In about 20% of the patients, the disease progresses towards more complex forms (interstitial pneumonia to acute respiratory distress and multiple organ failure) with the need of hospitalization in CICU and advanced ventilator assistance. The transmission of the virus occurs very easily from the symptomatic patient s droplets from coughing and sneezing and from direct contact with persons or surfaces. In a patient presenting with ST elevation (STEMI) myocardial infarction or STEMI-like, if positive to COVID-19, the reperfusion therapeutic strategy depends on the local organization and on the possibility to access without delay a PCI COVID Center, on the basis, obviously, of the risk/benefit assessment of the individual case. However, we advise to try pursuing, in the first instance, the mechanical revascularization strategy, according to the available local possibilities.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL